Meta, Google and channel choice
Last updated 2026-09-09
As a full funnel with four layers — top, middle, bottom and a separate retargeting pool — with channel-partner demand and end-buyer demand run as entirely separate campaigns. That separation is the structural decision that matters most: the two audiences respond to opposite creative, convert at different rates and, mixed together, will corrupt each other's optimisation signal so that neither performs.
A channel partner is evaluating inventory and commission. An end buyer is evaluating a home. The creative that works for one actively repels the other, and because partners fill forms more readily than buyers do, a mixed campaign will drift towards partners while reporting a healthy cost per lead. You end up paying end-buyer prices for a list of brokers.
Run enough creative cells that a losing concept can be killed without collapsing the ad set, and watch frequency alongside cost per result. When frequency climbs and cost per result climbs with it, the audience has seen the creative enough times; that is a refresh trigger, not an audience problem, and swapping audiences instead of creative at that moment is the most common misdiagnosis.
This is the practical reason creative volume is included in the fee rather than metered — the refresh needs to happen the week the numbers say so.
Instant forms produce more leads at a lower cost and a worse contact rate; landing pages produce fewer, better, more expensive leads. Neither is correct in the abstract. Choose based on whether your sales team's constraint is capacity or quality, and if you use instant forms, add qualifying questions — the friction is the point.
A Phase 0 call is a questionnaire, not a pitch. You get the market read before anyone spends a rupee on advertising.
Book a Phase 0 call ↗